GJMMS uses editorial screening and independent peer review to evaluate scholarly quality, originality, and relevance.
The review process is designed to be fair, confidential, evidence-based, and focused on improving the quality of published research.
Submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure their suitability for publication in our international journal. Initially, the editorial desk conducts a screening for scope, completeness, originality, and ethical compliance. Papers that pass this phase are assigned to independent expert reviewers to evaluate their scientific merit, ensuring only high-quality work is accepted. If you want to publish your paper in our global journal, our double-blind process ensures a fair and robust evaluation.
Reviewers assess the contribution, methodology, analytical soundness, literature engagement, clarity, and reliability of the conclusions. Based on their reports, editorial decisions are made. The journal is committed to completing reviews in a constructive and timely manner (typically within 3-5 weeks).
The journal values constructive, respectful, and objective peer review. Even when a manuscript is not accepted, reviewer feedback is intended to help authors strengthen and develop their research for future publication.